Tag Archive: google

SEO? No, Copywriting!

In the last few months I’ve read a lot about Search Engine Optimization, being eager of raking my main blog well in Google. Finally I ended up reading CopyBlogger, which is much better.

There are to approaches to SEO:

  1. People optimizing to the death all sorts of aspects to their site, from the links to the tags to the sitemap. This takes a lot of time and people often forget the most important thing: creating content. Because in order for your SEO to work you have to have what to optimize.
  2. Copywriting instead of SEO. This is not a popular technique among onliners in Romania, which basically fight over the same keyphrases with seo tricks, instead of spending a little more time on writing an original title and a good first phrase/meta description. Of course, you need to hire people that are good at it, and they are expensive.

Yoast’s plugin is a good addition to my blog. He is doing the automated part of the content optimizing, while i focus on the creation of original and meaningful content.

very little original content…

A quote from a discussion about the new Google search changes, from a guy who operates an aggregator:

There is very little "truly original" content out there, virtually every single blog rehashes the content of others. Is Techmeme of no value? Is Digg of no value? Is Topix of no value?

Also, we do actually produce some original content, we have a small staff of writers who create "featured posts" every day…

See the problem? It’s not that sites like his are polluting the internet with mashed up articles from around the web, it’s that the true original content is very little. So I am asking the question he forgot to ask: why is that? Because of sites like his, of course!

I want action!

I want action, oooo
Satisfaction, oooo!

Poison said it, not me. IT’s what came to mind reading this post by Matt Cutts. The fun part is here:

One misconception that we’ve seen in the last few weeks is the idea that Google doesn’t take as strong action on spammy content in our index if those sites are serving Google ads. To be crystal clear:

  • Google absolutely takes action on sites that violate our quality guidelines regardless of whether they have ads powered by Google;

Yes. And pigs fly!!!

Google criticism

http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/08/google-mojo/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/jan/04/google-spam

A lot of people seem displeased with the results of their searches. Meanwhile, google makes money off the bad search engine it has evolved.

About twitter pagerank

I’ve noticed that my twitter page has a bigger Page Rank than my blog. Even if i understand why the links in the stream are nofollow, i can’t find any reason why my website from my twitter profile has a nofollow tag. I’ve helped grown twitter PR, wouldn’t make sense for them to return the favor?